Maffei's Straight Talk on Iraq vs. Walsh's Silence
Dan Maffei explains on his website what he thinks about Iraq. He does so in clear words. In contrast, Jim Walsh's website has not one word to say about Iraq.
This simple fact highlights the difference between the two men.
From Dan Maffei's website:
"Now is the time to bring our brave troops home from Iraq in as safe as possible a way and allow the Iraqi people to govern themselves"
"I support an independent congressional investigation of those Bush Administration officials involved in bringing our nation to war under false pretexts."
Contrast that with Walsh's campaign website, specifically his issues section.
You'll see "endorsements", "agriculture", "Ireland", etc...
But nothing on Iraq. Why? Is Walsh hiding from the Iraq issue?
Or maybe he thinks the isolated folk in Syracuse think more about "agriculture" and "Ireland" then the country the US is fighting a WAR in.
The contrast between Jim Walsh and Dan Maffei could not be clearer. Readers, please help Dan Maffei however you can and lets send Jim Walsh into retirement.